How does JSON differ from XML in data transmission?

JSON is often considered lighter and easier to parse than XML due to its simpler syntax and structure. The primary reason for this is that JSON uses a key-value pair format, which makes it more concise. In contrast, XML relies on a more verbose markup language with opening and closing tags, which increases the amount of text required to represent the same data.

Additionally, JSON is designed to be easily readable by both humans and machines. Its data format is straightforward, making it faster and less resource-intensive for parsers to work with. JSON's less complex structure allows for quicker data retrieval and processing, which is particularly beneficial in web applications where performance is crucial.

While it is true that JSON supports a limited range of data types compared to XML, it nonetheless encapsulates basic types such as strings, numbers, arrays, and objects in a way that is sufficient for most use cases in data transmission. XML, on the other hand, does not natively support data types but rather treats everything as a string.

Although JSON data is transmitted in plain text, it is not exclusively transmitted that way, as it can also be serialized and compressed, which can lead to misunderstandings about its representation. Therefore, the assertion that JSON is lighter and easier to parse captures the essential